Lapse Of Punishment By Pardon In The Kuwaiti Penal Code: A Comparative Study

سقوط العقوبة بالعفو في قانون الجزاء الكويتي: دراسة مقارنة

Authors

  • Sultan F M KH Alotaibi PhD Candidate
  • Noor Naemah Abdul Rahman Associate Professor
  • Ameen Ahmed Abdullah Qasem Al-Nahari Senior Lecturer

Keywords:

Penalties, Pardon, Law, Kuwait, Fiqh

Abstract

This paper examines the lapse of penalties by way of pardon based on a comparative study between Kuwait’s penal code and fiqh. It sheds light on what lapse of penalties by way of pardon is and compares its ruling between Kuwait’s penal code and Islamic jurisprudence. It presents an applicable legitimate proposal. The problem of this study lies in the fact that the observer of jurists’ (fuqaha’) literature in regard of the lapse of penalties by way of pardon would find that there is a corelation between the penalty and the pardon related to the nature of the penalty. This corelation between the justness of the punishment and the lawfulness of the pardon necessitates a study from Shari’ah perspective to show what lapse of penalties by way of pardon is, and to evaluate the results against the Kuwait’s penal code regarding the matter. The study aims to shed light on both the linguistic and Shar’i (legal) meanings, what lapse of penalties by way of pardon is, and the difference between Kuwait’s penal code and Islamic jurisprudence regarding it. The researcher used different methods namely: the inductive, the analytical, the deductive, and the argumentative method; supporting each one of them with a comparative approach through examining the discussed issues against the views of the four schools of Islamic jurisprudence and Kuwait’s penal code. The study showed that pardon is applicable only when it is related to individual rights, or the public right when decided by the ruler based on his knowledge about the matter as long as it is not related to any of the hudud nor results in harm to the public good. The study also found that Kuwait’s penal code is in accordance with Islamic jurisprudence regarding the extinguishment of penalties by pardon holding the above considerations. Kuwait’s law which authorizes the application of pardon related to individual rights on sentences which do not exceed five years of imprisonment is indeed in compliance with the opinion of Hanafiyyah, Malikiyyah and Hanabilah regarding the fact that the ruler has the right to limit the application of the pardon according to what he sees appropriate considering the more favourable sentence. The researcher recommends studying the limitations of penalties in Kuwait’s penal code and then to compare it with Islamic jurisprudence in order to identify what agrees with it and what does not.

ملخص البحث

تناولت الدراسة "سقوط العقوبة بالعفو في قانون الجزاء الكويتي: مقارنة بالفقه الإسلامي"، حيث تكشف عن ماهية سقوط العقوبة بالعفو، وتبين حكمه؛ مقارنا بين قانون الجزاء الكويتي والفقه الإسلامي، بما تقدمه من طرح تأصيلي، صالح للتطبيق، وتكمن مشكلة البحث في كون المتأمل فيما ذكر الفقهاء في مسألة سقوط العقوبة بالعفو يلحظ وجود تناسب بينهما "العقوبة والعفو" يتعلق بطبيعة تلك العقوبة،، وهذا التناسب الواقع بين عدالة العقوبة ومشروعية العفو، يتطلب دراسة شرعية تبين حقيقة سقوط العقوبة بالعفو، وتكشف عن ماهيتها، مع مقارنة ذلك بما قرره قانون الجزاء الكويتي فيها، وتهدف الدراسة لبيان مفهوم العفو لغة وشرعا، والكشف عن حقيقة سقوط العقوبة بالعفو، وإبراز التباين بين قانون الجزاء الكويتي والفقه الإسلامي في قضية سقوط العقوبة بالعفو، وقد قامت الدراسة على المنهج الاستقرائي، والتحليلي، والاستنباطي، والاستدلالي، مع دعم كل منها بالمنهج المقارن من خلال عرض مسائل البحث على المذاهب الفقهية الأربعة، واختيار الراجح منها، ثم مقارنة ذلك بقانون الجزاء الكويتي، وقد خلصت لعدد من النتائج، أبرزها: أن محل انعقاد العفو عند العلماء هو الحقوق الخاصة، أو في الحق العام الذي يقدره ولي الأمر بناء على علمه به، مما لا يتعلق بحد من الحدود المتعلقة بحق الله تعالى، ولا بما يعود على الناس بالفساد، وأن قانون الجزاء الكويتي يتفق مع الفقه الإسلامي في سقوط العقوبة بالعفو بهذا الاعتبار، وقد أجاز القانون الكويتي إنفاذ العفو الخاص في العقوبات التي لا تتجاوز مدة عقوبتها خمس سنوات، وهذا يتفق مع قول الحنفية والمالكية والحنابلة في أن من حق السلطان تقييد قبول العفو بالخاص بما يراه مناسبًا مراعاة لحكم الأصلح، ويوصي الباحث بدراسة مسقطات العقوبة في قانون الجزاء الكويتي، ومقارنتها مع الفقه الإسلامي؛ بغرض تمييز المخالف منها والموافق.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sultan F M KH Alotaibi , PhD Candidate

Department of Fiqh and Usul, Academy of Islamic Studies, University of Malaya.

Noor Naemah Abdul Rahman , Associate Professor

Department of Fiqh and Usul, Academy of Islamic Studies, University of Malaya.

Ameen Ahmed Abdullah Qasem Al-Nahari , Senior Lecturer

Department of Fiqh and Usul, Academy of Islamic Studies, University of Malaya.

References

Abu Hayyan, Muhammad bin Yusuf bin ‘Aliyy Al-Andalusiyy. 2010. Al-Bahr Al-Muhit Fi Al-Tafsir. Bayrut: Dar Al-Fikr.

Abu Al-Sa‘ud, Muhammad bin Muhammad bin Mustafa. N.d. Tafsir Abi Al-Sa‘ud. Bayrut: Dar Ihya Al-Turath Al-Arabiyy.

Abu Ya‘la, Muhammad bin Al-Hussayn Al-Farra’. 2000. Al-Ahkam Al-Sultaniyyah. Bayrut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah.

‘Aliysh, Abu ‘Abdullah Muhammad ibn Ahmad. 1989. Manhu Al-Jalil Sharh Mukhtasar Khalil. Bayrut: Dar Al-Fikr.

Al-Athiyubiyy, Muhammad bin ‘Aliyy Adam Al-Walawiyy. 2003. Dhakhirah Al-‘Uqba FI Sharh Al-Mujtaba. Dar Ali Burum.

Ahmad Salamah Al-Qalyubiyy Wa Ahmad Al-Burlisiyy ‘Umayrah. 1995. Hashiyata Qalyubiyy Wa ‘Umayrah. Bayrut: Dar Al-Fikr.

Al-Ba‘aliyy, Muhammad ibn Abi Al-Fath. N.d. Al-Matla‘ ‘Ala Alfaz Al-Muqni‘. Al-Sa‘udiyyah: Al-Maktabat Al-Sawadiyy.

Al-Baghawiyy Muhyi Al-Sunnah Abu Muhammad Al-Husayn bin Mas‘ud bin Muhammad Al-Farra‘. 1997. Al-Tahdhib Fi Fiqh Al-Imam Al-Shafi‘iyy. Bayrut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Bahutiyy, Mansur bin Yunus bin Idris. 1983. Kashshaf Al-Qina‘ Fi Matn Al-Iqna‘. Bayrut: ‘Alam Al-Kutub.

Al-Baydawiyy, Nasir Al-Din Abu Sa‘id ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar bin Muhammad Al-Shiraziyy. 1418H. Anwar Al-Tanzil Wa Asrar Al-Ta'wil. Bayrut: Dar Ihya’ Al-Turath Al-‘Arabiyy.

Al-Bajiyy. 2009. Al-Muntaqa Sharh Al-Muwatta’. Bayrut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyya.

Al-Barkatiyy, Muhammad ‘Amim Al-Ihsan Al-Mujaddidiyy. 1986. Al-Ta‘rifat Al-Fiqhiyyah. Bayrut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Dasuqiyy. 2010. Hashiyat Al-Dasuqiyy ‘Ala Al-Sharh Al-Kabir. Bayrut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Dasuqiyy, Tariq Ibrahim. 2019. Sharh Ahkam Al-Jara’im Fi Qanun Al-Jaza’ Al-Kuwaitiyy. Al-Iskandariyyah. Dar Al-Jami‘ah Al-Jadid.

Al-Ghamidiyy, ‘Abdullah ‘Atiyyah ‘Abdullah. 1987. Asbab Suqut Al-‘Uqubah Fi Al-Fiqh Al-Islamiyy. Makkat Al-Mukarramah: Jami‘ah Umm Al-Qura, Kulliyyat Al-Shari‘ah Wa Al-Dirasat Al-Islamiyyah. Risalah Majistir.

Hashim, Mahmud Hashim. N.d. Qanun Al-Qada’ Al-Madaniyy. Al-Qahirah: Dar Al-Fikr Al-‘Arabiyy.

Al-Hattab, Abu ‘Abdillah Muhammad bin Muhammad bin ‘Abd Al-Rahman. 1992. Mawahib Al-Jalil Sharh Mukhtasar Khalil. N.pl: Dar Al-Fikr.

Al-Hijawiyy, Abu Al-Naja. 1900. Al-Iqna‘ Fi Fiqh Al-Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal. Bayrut: Dar Al-Ma‘rifah Li al-Tiba‘ah Wa Al-Nashr.

Ibn ‘Abd Al-Salam, ‘Izz Al-Din. 1991. Qawa‘id Al-Ahkam Fi Masalih Al-Anam. Al-Qahirah: Maktabat Al-Kulliyyat Al-Azhariyyah.

Ibn ‘Abidin, Muhammad Amin bin ‘Umar. 1992. Radd Al-Muhtar ‘Ala Al-Durr Al-Mukhtar. Bayrut: Dar Al-Fikr.

Ibn ‘Atiyyah, Abu Muhammad ‘Abd Al-Haqq bin Ghalib bin ‘Abd Al-Rahman Al-Muharibiyy Al-Qurtubiyy. 1422H. Al-Muharrar Al-Wajiz Fi Tafsir Al-Kitab Al-‘Aziz. Bayrut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Ibn Farhun. 2003. Tabsirat Al-Hukkam Fi Usul Al-Aqdiyyah Wa Minhaj Al-Ahkam. Dar ‘Alam Al-Kutub Li al-Nashr Wa Al-Tawzi‘.

Ibn Faris, Ahmad bin Zakariyya bin Faris Al-Qazwiniyy. 1979. Maqayis Al-Lughah. Bayrut: Dar Al-Fikr.

Ibn Al-Humam, Ahmad bin Qudar Qadiyy Zadah. 2003. Fath Al-Qadir. Bayrut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Ibn Hazm, Abu Muhammed ‘Aliyy bin Ahmad bin Sa‘id. Maratib Al-Ijma‘. Bayrut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Ibn Hussayn, Muhammad bin ‘Aliyy bin Husayn Al-Malikiyy. N.d. Tahdhib Al-Faruq Wa – Al-Qawa‘id Al-Saniyyah Fi Al-Asrar Al-Fiqhiyyah, Matbu‘ah Bi-Hashiyah Al-Faruq Lil-Qarafiyy. Al-Riyadh: Dar ‘Alam Al-Kutub.

Ibn Juzay, Abu Al-Qasim Muhammad bin Ahmad bin Muhammad Al-Kalbiyy Al-Gharnatiyy. 1416H. Al-Tashil Li ‘Ulum Al-Tanzil. Bayrut: Shirkah Dar Al-Arqam bin Abi Al-Arqam.

Ibn Muflih, Burhan Al-Din Ibrahim. 2003. Al Mubdi‘ Fi Sharh Al-Muqni‘. Al-Riyad: ‘Alam Al-Kutub.

Ibn Al-Qattan. 2004. Al-Iqna‘ ‘An Masa’il Al-Ijma‘. Al-Qahirah: Al-Faruq Al-Hadithah Li al-Tiba‘ah Wa Al-Nashr.

Ibn Qudamah, Muwaffaq Al-Din. 1994. Al-Kafiyy Fi Fiqh Al-Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal. Bayrut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Ibn Qudamah, Muwaffaq Al-Din. 1997. Al-Mughniyy. Al-Riyad: Dar ‘Alam Al-Kutub.

Al-Jamal, Sulayman bin ‘Umar. N.d. Futuhat Al-Wahhab Bi Tawdih Sharh Manhaj Al-Tullab. Bayrut: Dar Al-Fikr.

Jam‘iyyat Al-Muhamin Al-Kuwaytiyyah. 2011. Qanun Al-Jaza’ Al-Kuwaytiyy.

Karim, ‘Abd Al-Wahid. N.d. Mu‘jam Mustalahat Al-Shari‘ah Wa Al-Qanun. Al-Qahirah: Dar Al-Kutub Al-Qanuniyyah.

Al-Kasaniyy, Abu Bakar ibn Mas‘ud. 2003. Bada’i‘ Al-Sana‘i‘ Fi Tartib Al-Shara‘i‘. Bayrut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Lashin, Musa Shahin. 2002. Fath Al-Mun‘im Bi Sharh Sahih Muslim. N.pl: Dar Al-Shuruq.

Al-Mawardiyy, Abu Al-Hassan. 2001. Al-Ahkam Al-Sultaniyyah. Al-Qahirah: Dar Al-Fikr Al-‘Arabiyy.

Al-Nawawiyy, Abu Zakariyya Yahya bin Sharaf. 1412H. Rawdat Al-Talibin Wa-‘Umdah Al-Muftin. Bayrut: Al-Maktab Al-Islamiyy.

Al-Qurtubiyy, Muhammad bin Ahmad. 2006. Tafsir al-Qurtubiyy. Bayrut: Mu’assasat Al-Risalah.

Al-Raziyy, Fakhr Al-Din. 1981. Mafatih Al-Ghayb Al-Tafsir Al-Kabir. Dimashq: Dar Al-Fikr.

Ibn Ruslan, Shihab Al-Din Abu Al-‘Abbas Ahmad bin Al-Husayn bin ‘Aliyy Al-Maqdisiyy Al-Ramliyy. 2016. Sharh Sunan Abi Dawud. Misr: Dar Al-Falah.

Al-Sarakhsiyy, Shams Al-Din. N.d. Al-Mabsut. Bayrut: Dar Al-Ma‘rifah.

Ibn Saydah. 2000. Al-Muhkam Wa Al-Muhit Al-A‘zam. Bayrut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Shawkaniyy, Muhammad bin ‘Aliyy. 2003. Nayl Al-Awtar Sharh Muntaqa Al-Akhbar. Al-Riyad: Dar Ibn Al-Jawziyy.

Al-Sindiyy, Nur Al-Din Muhammad ibn ‘Abd Al-Hadiyy. N.d. Hashiyah Al-Sindiyy ‘Ala Sunan Ibn Majah. Bayrut: Dar Al-Fikr.

Al-Zayla‘iyy, Uthman bin ‘Aliyy bin Mahjan. N.d. Tabyin Al-Haqa’iq Sharh Kanz Al-Daqa’iq. Bayrut: Dar Al-Kitab Al-Islamiyy.

Al-Zubaydiyy. N.d. Taj Al-‘Arus. N.pl: Dar Al-Hidayah.

Al-Zuhayliyy Wa Hamish. 2019. Mu‘jam Mustalahat Al-Qada’ Al-Shar‘iyy. Dimashq: Dar Al-Bayan.

Published

2021-09-28

How to Cite

Alotaibi , S. F. M. K. ., Abdul Rahman , N. N., & Al-Nahari , A. A. A. Q. (2021). Lapse Of Punishment By Pardon In The Kuwaiti Penal Code: A Comparative Study: سقوط العقوبة بالعفو في قانون الجزاء الكويتي: دراسة مقارنة. Al-Qanatir: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 24(1), 108–125. Retrieved from http://al-qanatir.com/aq/article/view/349