FROM TAWHID TO CIRCUITS: A CURRICULUM FRAMEWORK FOR INTEGRATING TAWHIDIC EPISTEMOLOGY IN ELECRICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64757/alqanatir.2026.3505/1433Keywords:
Engineering, Education, Curriculum, Tawhidic, EpistemologyAbstract
Engineering students are not shaped by ethics courses alone; they are also shaped by how they learn to model a circuit, interpret a signal, and justify a design decision. This paper develops a conceptual curriculum framework to integrate Tawhidic Epistemology into electrical engineering education, so that ethical responsibility is built into technical learning rather than added at the margins. Methodologically, the paper uses an analytical synthesis of the literature on Tawhidic Epistemology, engineering ethics, and outcome-based curriculum design to construct a discipline-specific framework and illustrate its translation into selected electrical engineering courses. The framework begins from the unity of knowledge under Tawhid and connects revelation, reason, amanah, ibadah, and maqasid al-shari‘ah to curriculum design, course structuring, learning outcomes, assessment, and continuous quality improvement. In foundational courses such as Electric Circuits and Signals and Systems, the framework emphasizes disciplined reasoning, transparent assumptions, and awareness of consequence; in design and ethics-related courses, it requires students to justify trade-offs involving safety, sustainability, public interest, and professional accountability. The paper also distinguishes between primary courses, where Tawhidic integration is explicit and assessable, and supportive courses, where it is embedded through technical framing and contextual reflection. Rather than claiming validated implementation, the paper presents a structured, academically grounded model for curriculum development in Islamic higher education. Its contribution lies in showing how Tawhidic Epistemology can move from philosophical principle to concrete educational design in a way that preserves technical rigor, strengthens ethical judgment, and remains compatible with outcome-based education and continuous quality improvement.
Downloads
References
Auda, J. (2018). Maqasid Al-Shariah As Philosophy Of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach (2nd ed.). International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Banks, D. A., & Lachney, M. (2017). Engineered Violence: Confronting The Neutrality Problem And Violence In Engineering. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, 5(1), 26–46. https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/IJESJP/article/view/6604
Bakar, O. (2008). Tawhid And Science: Islamic Perspectives On Religion And Science. Arah Publications.
Bakar, O. (2011). Islamic Science, Modern Science, And Post-Modernity: Towards A New Synthesis Through A Tawhidic Epistemology. Revival: Journal of Islamic Civilization and Culture, 1(3). https://journals.iium.edu.my/revival/index.php/revival/article/view/36
Bakar, O. (2012). The Qur'anic Identity Of The Muslim Ummah: Tawhidic Epistemology As Its Foundation And Sustainer. Islam and Civilisational Renewal, 3(3). https://icrjournal.org/index.php/icr/article/view/531
Bakar, O. (2015). Islamic Civilisation And The Modern World: Thematic Essays. UBD Press.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching For Quality Learning At University (4th ed.). Open University Press.
Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Ethics Teaching In Undergraduate Engineering Education. Journal Of Engineering Education. 97(3), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00982.x
Hashim, R. (2014). Educational Dualism In Malaysia: Implications For Theory And Practice. Oxford University Press.
Hashim, R., & Rossidy, I. (2017). Islamization Of Knowledge: A Comparative Analysis Of Philosophical Approaches. Intellectual Discourse, 25(2), 369–394.
International Engineering Alliance. (2021). Graduate Attributes And Professional Competencies (Version 4). https://www.ieagreements.org
Kamali, M. H. (2016). The Middle Path Of Moderation In Islam. Oxford University Press.
Kamali, M. H. (2019). Shari'ah Law: An Introduction. Oneworld.
Kamali, M. H. (2021). Reason, Revelation, And Scientific Inquiry In Islam. Islamic Studies, 60(1), 1–22.
Korhonen-Yrjänheikki, K., & Takala, A. (2011). Values And Attitudes In Engineering Education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), 371–385.
Martin, D. A., Conlon, E., & Bowe, B. (2021). A Multi-Level Review Of Engineering Ethics Education: Towards A Socio-Technical Orientation Of Engineering Education For Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27, 1–26. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-021-00333-6
Miller, B. (2021). Is Technology Value-Neutral? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(2), 310–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919900965
Monteiro, F., Leite, C., & Rocha, C. (2019). From The Dominant Engineering Education perspective to the aim of promoting service to humanity and the common good. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(5), 781–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1435630
Nasr, S. H. (2018). Religion And The Order Of Nature. Oxford University Press.
Sardar, Z. (2020). The Future Of Muslim Civilisation. Pluto Press.
Schmidt, J. A. (2014). Changing The Paradigm For Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(4), 985–1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9491-y
Swartz, B. (2021). Ethics In Engineering Education 4.0: The Educator's Perspective. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9580771
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Teddy Surya Gunawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







